On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:21:31AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:55:22AM +0800, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > The function name alloc_huge_page_no_vma_node() has verbose suffix "_no_vma".
> > This patch makes existing alloc_huge_page() and it's family have "_vma" instead,
> > which makes it easier to read.
> >
...
> > @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, int delta)
> > retry:
> > spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > for (i = 0; i < needed; i++) {
> > - page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NULL, 0);
> > + page = alloc_buddy_huge_page_vma(h, NULL, 0);
>
> alloc_buddy_huge_page() doesn't make use of @vma at all, so the
> parameters can be removed.
OK.
> It looks cleaner to fold the
> alloc_huge_page_no_vma_node=>alloc_huge_page_node renames into the
> previous patch, from there split out the code refactor chunks into
> a standalone patch, and then include this cleanup patch.
When we unify alloc_buddy_huge_page() as commented for patch 2/8,
_vma suffix is not necessary any more. Your suggestion to drop
unused arguments sounds reasonable,
so I merge the attached patch into patch 2/8.
Thanks,
Naoya
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>