Re: [PATCH/RFCv4 0/6] The Contiguous Memory Allocator framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:58:57 +0200, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmm, you may not like this..but how about following kind of interface ?

Now, memoyr hotplug supports following operation to free and _isolate_
memory region.
	# echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state

Then, a region of memory will be isolated. (This succeeds if there are free
memory.)

Add a new interface.

	% echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state
	# extract memory from System RAM and make them invisible from buddy allocator.

	% echo cma > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state
	# move invisible memory to cma.

At this point I need to say that I have no experience with hotplug memory but
I think that for this to make sense the regions of memory would have to be
smaller.  Unless I'm misunderstanding something, the above would convert
a region of sizes in order of GiBs to use for CMA.

--
Best regards,                                        _     _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of  o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science,  Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz       (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]