On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:37:08 +0200, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whats the rationale for having those #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS sprinkled in the C code? Is SysFS not used on StrongARM? Why not implicitly include the SysFS support?
The SysFS CMA interface is meant for development only and because of that I decided to separate it form the core in a separate patch and enable it only when explicitly requested. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href