Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: ID notification call back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:04:52 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > CC'ed to Paul Menage and Li Zefan.
> > ==
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > When cgroup subsystem use ID (ss->use_id==1), each css's ID is assigned
> > after successful call of ->create(). css_ID is tightly coupled with
> > css struct itself but it is allocated by ->create() call, IOW,
> > per-subsystem special allocations.
> > 
> > To know css_id before creation, this patch adds id_attached() callback.
> > after css_ID allocation. This will be used by memory cgroup's quick lookup
> > routine.
> > 
> > Maybe you can think of other implementations as
> > 	- pass ID to ->create()
> > 	or
> > 	- add post_create()
> > 	etc...
> > But when considering dirtiness of codes, this straightforward patch seems
> > good to me. If someone wants post_create(), this patch can be replaced.
> > 
> > Changelog: 20100820
> >  - new approarch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ...
> >  
> > Index: mmotm-0811/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mmotm-0811.orig/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ mmotm-0811/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
> >  			struct cgroup *cgrp);
> >  	void (*post_clone)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp);
> >  	void (*bind)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *root);
> > +	void (*id_attached)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp);
> 
> Maybe pass the id number to id_attached() is better.
> 
ok.

> And actually the @ss argument is not necessary, because the memcg's
> id_attached() handler of course knows it's dealing with the memory
> cgroup subsystem.
> 
> So I suspect we can just remove all the @ss from all the callbacks..
> 

I agree. But could you write "remove ss" patch later ?
It seems an design change. I leave "ss" as this for now.

Thanks
-Kame


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]