Re: compaction: trying to understand the code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:31:21AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> <SNIP>
> 
> From 560e8898295c663f02aede07b3d55880eba16c69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:20:44 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly in too_many_isolated
> 
> Iram reported compaction's too_many_isolated loops forever.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg08123.html)
> 
> The meminfo of situation happened was inactive anon is zero.
> That's because the system has no memory pressure until then.
> While all anon pages was in active lru, compaction could select
> active lru as well as inactive lru. That's different things
> with vmscan's isolated. So we has been two too_many_isolated.
> 
> While compaction can isolated pages in both active and inactive,
> current implementation of too_many_isolated only considers inactive.
> It made Iram's problem.
> 
> This patch handles active and inactie with fair.
> That's because we can't expect where from and how many compaction would
> isolated pages.
> 
> This patch changes (nr_isolated > nr_inactive) with
> nr_isolated > (nr_active + nr_inactive) / 2.
> 
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

Seems reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>

Want to repost this as a standalone patch?

> ---
>  mm/compaction.c |    9 +++++----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 94cce51..0864839 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -214,15 +214,16 @@ static void acct_isolated(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
>  /* Similar to reclaim, but different enough that they don't share logic */
>  static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
>  {
> -
> -       unsigned long inactive, isolated;
> +       unsigned long active, inactive, isolated;
>  
>         inactive = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
>                                         zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> +       active = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> +                                       zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON);
>         isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) +
>                                         zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> -
> -       return isolated > inactive;
> +
> +       return isolated > (inactive + active) / 2;
>  }
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]