On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > This seems significantly cleaner than previous. Of cource, even though I need > to review [1/3] carefully. Unfortunatelly I'm very busy in this week, then > my responce might late a while. but it's not mean silinetly nak. > I agree, it's much better than making select_bad_process() turn out to be O(n^2) when no threads are OOM_DISABLE. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>