On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:12:50 +0200, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1. Integration on API level meaning that some kind of existing API is used
instead of new cma_*() calls. CMA adds notion of devices and memory
types which is new to all the other APIs (coherent has notion of devices
but that's not enough). This basically means that no existing API can be
used for CMA. On the other hand, removing notion of devices and memory
types would defeat the whole purpose of CMA thus destroying the solution
that CMA provides.
You can create something similar to the existing API for memory
allocator.
That may be tricky. cma_alloc() takes four parameters each of which is
required for CMA. No other existing set of API uses all those arguments.
This means, CMA needs it's own, somehow unique API. I don't quite see
how the APIs may be unified or "made similar". Of course, I'm gladly
accepting suggestions.
2. Reuse of memory pools meaning that memory reserved by CMA can then be
used by other allocation mechanisms. This is of course possible. For
instance coherent could easily be implemented as a wrapper to CMA.
This is doable and can be done in the future after CMA gets more
recognition.
3. Reuse of algorithms meaning that allocation algorithms used by other
allocators will be used with CMA regions. This is doable as well and
can be done in the future.
Well, why can't we do the above before the inclusion?
Because it's quite a bit of work and instead of diverting my attention I'd
prefer to make CMA as good as possible and then integrate it with other
subsystems. Also, adding the integration would change the patch from being
4k lines to being like 40k lines.
What I'm trying to say is that I don't consider that a work for now but
rather a further enchantments.
Anyway, I think that comments from mm people would be helpful to merge
this.
Yes, I agree.
--
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href