* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-08-18 11:13:03]: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Chris Webb wrote: > > > > != 0. And even then, zone reclaim should only reclaim file pages, not > > > anon. In theory... > > > > Hi. This is zero on all our machines: > > > > # sysctl vm.zone_reclaim_mode > > vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0 > > Set it to 1. > Isn't that bad in terms of how we treat the cost of remote node allocations? Is local zone_reclaim() always a good thing or is it something for chris to try and see if that helps his situation? -- Three Cheers, Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>