On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:46:56AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > BTW, from the discussion with Christoph I noticed my misunderstanding > > about the necessity of additional page locking. It would seem that > > without page locking there is no danger of racing between direct I/O and > > page migration. So I retract this additional locking patch-set. > > OK, great! ;-) Well it sounds like we still may need something. It isn't good if O_DIRECT can starve (or DoS) migration. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>