Re: [PATCH 3/7] vmscan: synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/05/2010 02:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
When synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to
reclaim pages even if page is locked. We use lock_page() instead
trylock_page() in this case.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]