On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:02:13 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:12:26 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This a complete rewrite of the oom killer's badness() heuristic > > > > > > > > Any comments here, or are we ready to proceed? > > > > > > > > Gimme those acked-bys, reviewed-bys and tested-bys, please! > > > > > > If he continue to resend all of rewrite patch, I continue to refuse them. > > > I explained it multi times. > > > > There are about 1000 emails on this topic. Please briefly explain it again. > > Major homework are > > - make patch series instead unreviewable all in one patch. Sometimes that's not very practical and the splitup isn't necessarily a lot easier to understand and review. It's still possible to review the end result - just read the patched code. > - kill oom_score_adj Unclear why? > - write test way and test result I think David's done quite a bit of that? > So, I'm pending reviewing until finish them. I'd like to point out > rest minor topics while reviewing process. I think I'll merge it into 2.6.36. That gives us two months to continue to review it, to test it and if necessary, to fix it or revert it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>