Re: [PATCH] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem - v4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:55:53PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 
> > And no, setting the sparse section size to 512kB doesn't work - memory is
> > offset by 256MB already, so you need a sparsemem section array of 1024
> > entries just to cover that - with the full 256MB populated, that's 512
> > unused entries followed by 512 used entries.  That too is going to waste
> > memory like nobodies business.
> 
> SPARSEMEM EXTREME does not handle that?
> 
> Some ARMs seem to have MMUs. If so then use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. You can map
> 4k pages for the mmap through a page table. Redirect unused 4k blocks to
> the NULL page.

We're going over old ground which has already been covered in this very
thread.  I've no compunction to repeat the arguments.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]