On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:27:23AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > It is preferable that as few dirty pages are dispatched for cleaning from > the page reclaim path. When dirty pages are encountered by page reclaim, > this patch marks the inodes that they should be dispatched immediately. When > the background flusher runs, it moves such inodes immediately to the dispatch > queue regardless of inode age. Thus whole thing looks rather hacky to me. Does it really give a large enough benefit to be worth all the hacks? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>