[PATCH 0/2] vfs scalability tree fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: npiggin@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] vfs scalability tree fixes
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:04:00 +1000
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx, johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-mm-outgoing@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: int-list-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100723111310.GI32635@dastard>

Nick,

Here's the fixes I applied to your tree to make the XFS inode cache
shrinker build and scan sanely.

Cheers,

Dave.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs scalability tree fixes
  - From: Nick Piggin

References:
- Re: VFS scalability git tree
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: shrinker should use a per-filesystem scan count
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix shrinker build
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: shrinker should use a per-filesystem scan count
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs scalability tree fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]