> Some insight on how the other writeback changes that are being floated
> around might affect the number of dirty pages reclaim encounters would also
> be helpful.
Here is an interesting related problem about the wait_on_page_writeback() call
inside shrink_page_list():
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/4/86
The problem is, wait_on_page_writeback() is called too early in the
direct reclaim path, which blocks many random/unrelated processes when
some slow (USB stick) writeback is on the way.
A simple dd can easily create a big range of dirty pages in the LRU
list. Therefore priority can easily go below (DEF_PRIORITY - 2) in a
typical desktop, which triggers the lumpy reclaim mode and hence
wait_on_page_writeback().
I proposed this patch at the time, which was confirmed to solve the problem:
--- linux-next.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2010-06-24 14:32:03.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/vmscan.c 2010-07-22 16:12:34.000000000 +0800
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static void set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(int p
*/
if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
- else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
+ else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY / 2)
sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
else
sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 0;
However KOSAKI and Minchan raised concerns about raising the bar.
I guess this new patch is more problem oriented and acceptable:
--- linux-next.orig/mm/vmscan.c 2010-07-22 16:36:58.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/vmscan.c 2010-07-22 16:39:57.000000000 +0800
@@ -1217,7 +1217,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
nr_freed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc,
- PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC);
+ priority < DEF_PRIORITY / 3 ?
+ PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC : PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC);
}
nr_reclaimed += nr_freed;
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>