On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 03:31:19PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:38:57PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > @@ -858,7 +872,7 @@ keep:
> > > >
> > > > free_page_list(&free_pages);
> > > >
> > > > - list_splice(&ret_pages, page_list);
> > >
> > > This will lose all retry pages forever, I think.
> > >
> >
> > Above this is
> >
> > while (!list_empty(page_list)) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > page_list should be empty and keep_locked is putting the pages on ret_pages
> > already so I think it's ok.
>
> But ret_pages is function-local. Putting them back on the then-empty
> page_list is to give them back to the caller, otherwise they are lost
> in a dead stack slot.
>
Bah, you're right, it is repaired now. /me slaps self. Thanks
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>