Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > > Can you get us the config file. What is the value of
> > > PERCPU_DYMAMIC_EARLY_SIZE?
> >
> > My .config file is attached. I don't know how to find out what value
> > PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE is actually on, how could I do that? There's
> > no such thing in my .config.
> 
> I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to
> increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream?
> 

The problem is that he has CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 and struct kmem_cache has 
an array of struct kmem_cache_node pointers with MAX_NUMNODES entries 
which blows its size up to over 8K.  That's probably overkill for his 
quad-core 8GB AMD, so I'd recommend lowering CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 6.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]