Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On 07/14/2010 04:01 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to
> increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream?

It's basically checking constant expressions there and
PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE is defined as 12k, so slub is thinking that
it's gonna use more memory on that build.

> Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON. I had it misfire before and
> fixed the formulae to no longer give false positives. Maybe that is
> another case. Tejun wanted that but never was able to give me an exact
> formular to check for.

Yeah, unfortunately, due to alignment requirements, it can't be
determined with accuracy.  We'll just have to size it sufficiently.

> At the Ottawa Linux Symposium right now so responses may be delayed.
> Hotels Internet connection keeps getting clogged for some reason.

I'm in suse labs conf until next week so I don't think I'll be doing
much till then either.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]