Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:44:41 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Kame.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:23 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:44:23 +0900
> > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> > If you _really_ can't make the section size smaller, and the vast
> >> > majority of the sections are fully populated, you could hack something
> >> > in.  We could, for instance, have a global list that's mostly readonly
> >> > which tells you which sections need to be have their sizes closely
> >> > inspected.  That would work OK if, for instance, you only needed to
> >> > check a couple of memory sections in the system.  It'll start to suck if
> >> > you made the lists very long.
> >>
> >> Thanks for advise. As I say, I hope Russell accept 16M section.
> >>
> >
> > It seems what I needed was good sleep....
> > How about this if 16M section is not acceptable ?
> >
> > == NOT TESTED AT ALL, EVEN NOT COMPILED ==
> >
> > register address of mem_section to memmap itself's page struct's pg->private field.
> > This means the page is used for memmap of the section.
> > Otherwise, the page is used for other purpose and memmap has a hole.
> 
> It's a very good idea. :)
> But can this handle case that a page on memmap pages have struct page
> descriptor of hole?
> I mean one page can include 128 page descriptor(4096 / 32).
yes.

> In there, 64 page descriptor is valid but remain 64 page descriptor is on hole.
> In this case, free_memmap doesn't free the page.

yes. but in that case, there are valid page decriptor for 64pages of holes.
pfn_valid() should return true but PG_reserved is set.
(This is usual behavior.)

My intention is that

 - When all 128 page descriptors are unused, free_memmap() will free it.
   In that case, clear page->private of a page for freed page descriptors.

 - When some of page descriptors are used, free_memmap() can't free it
   and page->private points to &mem_section. We may have memmap for memory
   hole but pfn_valid() is a function to check there is memmap or not.
   The bahavior of pfn_valid() is valid.
   Anyway, you can't free only half of page.

If my code doesn't seem to work as above, it's bug.


Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]