> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > Christoph, Can we hear your opinion about to add new branch in slab-free path? > > I think this is ok, because reclaim makes a lot of cache miss then branch > > mistaken is relatively minor penalty. thought? > > Its on the slow path so I would think that should be okay. But is this > really necessary? Working with the per zone slab reclaim counters is not > enough? We are adding counter after counter that have similar purposes and > the handling gets more complex. > > Maybe we can get rid of the code in the slabs instead by just relying on > the difference of the zone counters? Okey, I agree. I'm pending this work at once. and I'll (probably) resume it after Nick's work merged. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>