Re: [PATCH -mmotm 12/30] selinux: tag avc cache alloc as non-critical

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 13, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Xiaotian Feng wrote:

> From 6c3a91091b2910c23908a9f9953efcf3df14e522 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:02:41 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 12/30] selinux: tag avc cache alloc as non-critical
> 
> Failing to allocate a cache entry will only harm performance not correctness.
> Do not consume valuable reserve pages for something like that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/selinux/avc.c |    2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
> index 3662b0f..9029395 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/avc.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct avc_node *avc_alloc_node(void)
> {
> 	struct avc_node *node;
> 
> -	node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
> 	if (!node)
> 		goto out;
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.1.1
> 

Why not just replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_NOWAIT?

This would NOT consume the valuable last pages.

Mitchell Erblich
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]