Re: [PATCH 3/6] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:06:59 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
>
> ...
>
> +unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> +			       unsigned long dirty)

It'd be nice to have some documentation for these things.  They're
non-static, non-obvious and are stuffed to the gills with secret magic
numbers.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]