On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:06 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > [ small note on that we really should kill __GFP_NOFAIL, its utter > > deadlock potential ] > > I disagree. __GFP_NOFAIL mean this allocation failure can makes really > dangerous result. Instead, OOM-Killer should try to kill next process. > I think. Say _what_?! you think NOFAIL is a sane thing? Pretty much everybody has been agreeing for years that the thing should die. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href