> Yup. > If admins want to kill memory hogging process manually when the system > is under heavy swap thrashing, we will face the same problem, need > unfairness and fast exit. So, unfair exiting design looks very good. > > If you will updated the description, I'm glad :) I have one more topic. can we check fatal_signal_pending() instead TIF_MEMDIE? As I said, if the process received SIGKILL, do the fork/exec/brk/mmap starvations have any problem? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>