Re: [PATCH 6/7] hugetlb: hugepage migration core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I see.  I understood we should work on locking problem in now.
> I digged and learned hugepage IO can happen in direct IO from/to
> hugepage or coredump of hugepage user.
> 
> We can resolve race between memory failure and IO by checking
> page lock and writeback flag, right?

Yes, but we have to make sure it's in the same page.

As I understand the IO locking does not use the head page, that
means migration may need to lock all the sub pages.

Or fix IO locking to use head pages? 

> 
> BTW I surveyed direct IO code, but page lock seems not to be taken.
> Am I missing something?

That's expected I believe because applications are supposed to coordinate
for direct IO (but then direct IO also drops page cache). 

But page lock is used to coordinate in the page cache for buffered IO.


-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]