, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:19:38PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
, Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie<imunsie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch converts numerous trivial compat syscalls through the generic
kernel code to use the COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE family of macros.
Why? This just makes the code look uglier and the functions harder
to grep for.
Because it makes them usable with syscall tracing.
Ok that information is missing in the changelog then.
Also I hope the uglification<->usefullness factor is really worth it.
The patch is certainly no slouch on the uglification side.
It also has maintenance costs, e.g. I doubt ctags and cscope
will be able to deal with these kinds of macros, so it has a
high cost for everyone using these tools. For those
it would be actually better if you used separate annotation
that does not confuse standard C parsers.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>