Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: let the bdi_writeout fraction respond more quickly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 15:44 +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index 2fdda90..315dd04 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int calc_period_shift(void)
> >       else
> >               dirty_total = (vm_dirty_ratio * determine_dirtyable_memory()) /
> >                               100;
> > -     return 2 + ilog2(dirty_total - 1);
> > +     return ilog2(dirty_total - 1) - 4;
> >  } 

IIRC I suggested similar things in the past and all we needed to do was
find people doing the measurements on different bits of hardware or so..

I don't have any problems with the approach, all we need to make sure is
that we never return 0 or a negative number (possibly ensure a minimum
positive shift value).


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]