On 06/14/2010 07:17 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Now, max_scan of shrink_inactive_list() is always passed less than
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. then, we can remove scanning pages loop in it.
This patch also help stack diet.
detail
- remove "while (nr_scanned< max_scan)" loop
- remove nr_freed (now, we use nr_reclaimed directly)
- remove nr_scan (now, we use nr_scanned directly)
- rename max_scan to nr_to_scan
- pass nr_to_scan into isolate_pages() directly instead
using SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner<hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Other than the weird whitespace below,
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ /*
+ * If we are direct reclaiming for contiguous pages and we do
+ * not reclaim everything in the list, try again and wait
+ * for IO to complete. This will stall high-order allocations
+ * but that should be acceptable to the caller
+ */
+ if (nr_reclaimed< nr_taken&& !current_is_kswapd()&& sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode) {
+ congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>