Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim and use a_ops->writepages() where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:33:20PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Ok, I was under the mistaken impression that filesystems wanted to be
> given ranges of pages where possible. Considering that there has been no
> reaction to the patch in question from the filesystem people cc'd, I'll
> drop the problem for now.

Yes, we'd prefer them if possible.  Then again we'd really prefer to
get as much I/O as possible from the flusher threads, and not kswapd.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]