On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tasks that do not share the same set of allowed nodes with the task that > triggered the oom should not be considered as candidates for oom kill. > You're not a maintainer, as I obviously have to point out to you often enough. I've repeatedly asked you to work with me in reviewing my oom killer rewrite on linux-mm, yet you seldom offer any valuable feedback other than a simple "nack". I don't consider any of your patchset here to be more applicable than my patchset, which has been developed over the course of several months, and your lack of participation in the process is really quite shocking to me. In case nobody has told you before: Andrew maintains this code and these patches will be going through the -mm tree. You are not a maintainer of it (or any other kernel code), so please act within your role of kernel hacker and review patches as people propose them by offering your constructive feedback. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>