Re: [patch 02/18] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:

> Yes.  Although main thread detach mm, sub-thread still may have the mm.
> As you have confused, I think this function name isn't good.
> So I suggested following as.
> 

I think the function name is fine, it describes exactly what it does: it 
finds the relevant mm for the task and returns it with task_lock() held.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]