Re: [PATCH 1/5] oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 31 May 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: oom: select_bad_process: check PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads
> 
> select_bad_process() thinks a kernel thread can't have ->mm != NULL, this
> is not true due to use_mm().
> 
> Change the code to check PF_KTHREAD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This is already pushed in my oom killer rewrite as patch 14/18 "check 
PF_KTHREAD instead of !mm to skip kthreads".

This does not need to be merged immediately since it's not vital: use_mm() 
is only temporary state and these kthreads will once again be excluded 
when they call unuse_mm().  The worst case scenario here is that the oom 
killer will erroneously select one of these kthreads which cannot die and 
will need to reselect another task on its next call.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]