Re: [rfc] forked kernel task and mm structures imbalanced on NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> writes:

> This isn't really a new problem, and I don't know how important it is,
> but I recently came across it again when doing some aim7 testing with
> huge numbers of tasks.

Seems reasonable. Of course you need to at least 
save/restore the old CPU policy, and use a subset of it.

Another approach would be to migrate this on touch, but that is probably
slightly more difficult. The advantage would be that on multiple
migrations it would follow. And it would be a bit slower for
the initial case.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]