From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: oom: select_bad_process: PF_EXITING check should take ->mm into account
select_bad_process() checks PF_EXITING to detect the task which is going
to release its memory, but the logic is very wrong.
- a single process P with the dead group leader disables
select_bad_process() completely, it will always return
ERR_PTR() while P can live forever
- if the PF_EXITING task has already released its ->mm
it doesn't make sense to expect it is goiing to free
more memory (except task_struct/etc)
Change the code to ignore the PF_EXITING tasks without ->mm.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [rebase to latest -mm]
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 070b713..c87a6f4 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
* the process of exiting and releasing its resources.
* Otherwise we could get an easy OOM deadlock.
*/
- if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
+ if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p->mm) {
if (p != current)
return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>