On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 00:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> I think highest RT proirity ins't good solution. >> As I mentiond, Some RT functions don't want to be preempted by other processes >> which cause memory pressure. It makes RT task broken. > > All the patches I've seen use MAX_RT_PRIO-1, which is actually FIFO-1, > which is the lowest RT priority. Stupid me. I confused that until now. That's exactly what I want. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>