Re: oom killer rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Tue, 25 May 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > > > oom-avoid-race-for-oom-killed-tasks-detaching-mm-prior-to-exit.patch
> > > 	no objection. but afaik Oleg already pointed out "if (!p->mm)" is bad.
> > > 	So, Don't we need push his patch instead?
> > > 
> > 
> > I think it all depends on the order in which this work is merged.
> > 
> 
> I just noticed that Oleg's patches were dropped as well from -mm so I'll 
> merge them into my set and repost them as well.

Oops, no. It shouldn't. 
His patch is important and should be merged ASAP. I believe standalone merge is best.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]