Re: [PATCH 2/5] change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to inline function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:39:26PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Subject: change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to inline function
> 
> Subsitute a direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) with
> an inline function doing exactly the same.
> 
> This makes it easier to do the substitution to the root
> anon_vma lock in a following patch.
> 
> We will deal with the handful of special locks (nested,
> dec_and_lock, etc) separately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]