On 05/26/2010 03:25 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Rik van Riel wrote:
If you want I can send you and Andrew a duplicate of
what I sent this morning, with the only difference
being added Acked-by's.
I assume this will come through Andrew, so it depends on whether he is so
resigned to manually adding acks from following threads or not.
Personally, I think it's one of the responsibilities of the person pushing
the patch to do. Having the acked-by and reviewed-by trail should be one
of the things that makes it _way_ easier for upstream to decide whether a
patch should go in - especially if the people in question are active
maintainers.
I'll do a repost, gathering up the acks I have so far.
I just saw that patches 4 and 5 have no acks yet.
I've fixed up the comments to make the code clearer and
made the "find the root anon_vma" thing a little simpler
in anon_vma_fork.
Hopefully those patches will get acks now :)
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>