Re: page_mkwrite vs pte dirty race in fb_defio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 05/25/2010 06:01 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I couldn't find where this patch (49bbd815fd8) was discussed, so I'll
> make my own thread. Adding a few lists to cc because it might be of
> interest to driver and filesystem writers.
> 

The original thread can be found here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=127369791432181

> The old ->page_mkwrite calling convention was causing problems exactly
> because of this race, and we solved it by allowing page_mkwrite to
> return with the page locked, and the lock will be held until the
> pte is marked dirty. See commit b827e496c893de0c0f142abfaeb8730a2fd6b37f.
> 

Ah, didn't know about that. Thanks for the pointer.

> I hope that should provide a more elegant solution to your problem. I
> would really like you to take a look at that, because we already have
> filesystem code (NFS) relying on it, and more code we have relying on
> this synchronization, the more chance we would find a subtle problem
> with it (also it should be just nicer).
> 

So if I undestand it correctly, using the "new" calling convention I should just lock the page on fb_deferred_io_mkwrite() and return VM_FAULT_LOCKED to fix the described race for fb_defio.

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 

Thanks,
Albert

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]