Hehe, I just notice this this morning too, while investigating.
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:34 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently digging into the splice code to figure out why it's always in copy
> mode even though I specified the SPLICE_F_MOVE flag and released the page
> references from the LTTng ring buffer. I'm splicing to a pipe and then from the
> pipe to an ext3 filesystem (2.6.33.4 kernel). I've got the feeling I'm missing
> something and I don't like that.
>
> My simple test case is to add a printk around the splice copy:
>
> fs/splice.c: pipe_to_file()
> if (buf->page != page) {
> /*
> * Careful, ->map() uses KM_USER0!
> */
> char *src = buf->ops->map(pipe, buf, 1);
> char *dst = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER1);
>
> printk(KERN_WARNING "SPLICE COPY!!!\n");
> memcpy(dst + offset, src + buf->offset, this_len);
> flush_dcache_page(page);
> kunmap_atomic(dst, KM_USER1);
> buf->ops->unmap(pipe, buf, src);
I used trace_printk() since it is not as invasive.
> }
>
> I'll start with a disclaimer that I only recently improved my splice
> understanding, so AFAIU:
Same here ;-)
>
> * pipe_to_file() allocates a struct page *page on its stack.
>
> * It is passed, uninitialized, to
>
> ret = pagecache_write_begin(file, mapping, sd->pos, this_len,
> AOP_FLAG_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, &page, &fsdata);
>
> that looks already odd to me, as I would expect pipe_to_file to populate
> this page pointer with buf->page initially if the proper conditions are met.
>
> * Looking at the ext2 and ext3 write_begin code, neither are using the pagep
> parameter:
>
> ext2:
>
> static int
> ext2_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
> struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
> {
> *pagep = NULL;
> return __ext2_write_begin(file, mapping, pos, len, flags, pagep,fsdata);
> }
>
>
> ext3:
>
> static int ext3_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
> struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
> {
> struct page *page;
> ....
>
> retry:
> page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, index, flags);
> if (!page)
> return -ENOMEM;
> *pagep = page;
>
> * So, considering the test to check if the page content must be copied:
>
> if (buf->page != page) {
>
> how is it ever possible that buf->page == page ?
I'm currently looking at the network code to see if it is better.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>