On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 06:47:00PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > + if (hidden_num)
>
> if (hidden_num) is not required, as next line's for statement is also
> doing the same thing.
Good catching, We will remove this statement in the formal patch. Thanks Jaswinder.
Have a nice day.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jaswinder Singh.
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < hidden_num; i++) {
> > + int nid = num_nodes + i + 1;
> > + node_set(nid, node_possible_map);
> > + hidden_nodes[nid].start = hp_start + hp_size * i;
> > + hidden_nodes[nid].end = hp_start + hp_size * (i+1);
> > + node_set_hidden(nid);
> > + }
> > +}
--
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>