On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:51 +0800 Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -985,6 +984,7 @@ repeat:
> * for the read-side.
> */
> while (ACCESS_ONCE(tsk->mems_allowed_change_disable)) {
> + task_unlock(tsk);
> if (!task_curr(tsk))
> yield();
> goto repeat;
Oh, I meant to mention that. No yield()s, please. Their duration is
highly unpredictable. Can we do something more deterministic here?
Did you consider doing all this with locking? get_mems_allowed() does
mutex_lock(current->lock)?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>