> > If block layer overhead is a problem, go ahead and optimize it instead > > of adding new interfaces to bypass it. Though I expect it wouldn't be > > needed, and if any optimization needs to be done it is in the swap > > layer. > > Optimizing swap has the additional benefit of improving performance on > > flash-backed swap. > > : > > What happens when no tmem is available? you swap to a volume. That's > > the disk size needed. > > : > > You're dynamic swap is limited too. And no, no guest modifications. > > You keep saying you are going to implement all of the dynamic features > of frontswap with no changes to the guest and no copying and no > host-swapping. You are being disingenuous. VMware has had a lot I don't see why no copying is a requirement. I believe requirement should be "it is fast enough". Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>