On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:29:05AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > It could have been in both but the vma lock should have been held across > the rmap_one. It still reproduces but it's still the right thing to do. > This is the current version of patch 2/2. Well, keep in mind I reproduced the swapops bug with 2.6.33 anon-vma code, it's unlikely that focusing on patch 2 you'll fix bug in swapops.h. If this is a bug in the new anon-vma code, it needs fixing of course! But I doubt this bug is related to swapops in execve on the bprm->p args. I've yet to check in detail patch 1 sorry, I'll let you know my opinion about it as soon as I checked it in detail. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>