RE: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > a synchronous concurrency-safe page-oriented pseudo-RAM device (such
> >  :
> > conform to certain policies as follows:
> 
> How baked in is the synchronous requirement?  Memory, for example, can
> be asynchronous if it is copied by a dma engine, and since there are
> hardware encryption engines, there may be hardware compression engines
> in the future.

Thanks for the comment!

Synchronous is required, but likely could be simulated by ensuring all
coherency (and concurrency) requirements are met by some intermediate
"buffering driver" -- at the cost of an extra page copy into a buffer
and overhead of tracking the handles (poolid/inode/index) of pages in
the buffer that are "in flight".  This is an approach we are considering
to implement an SSD backend, but hasn't been tested yet so, ahem, the
proof will be in the put'ing. ;-)

Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]