On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:44:07 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ordinarily, application using hugetlbfs will create mappings with
> reserves. For shared mappings, these pages are reserved before mmap()
> returns success and for private mappings, the caller process is
> guaranteed and a child process that cannot get the pages gets killed
> with sigbus.
>
> An application that uses MAP_NORESERVE gets no reservations and mmap()
> will always succeed at the risk the page will not be available at fault
> time. This might be used for example on very large sparse mappings where the
> developer is confident the necessary huge pages exist to satisfy all faults
> even though the whole mapping cannot be backed by huge pages. Unfortunately,
> if an allocation does fail, VM_FAULT_OOM is returned to the fault handler
> which proceeds to trigger the OOM-killer. This is unhelpful.
>
> This patch alters hugetlbfs to kill a process that uses MAP_NORESERVE
> where huge pages were not available with SIGBUS instead of triggering
> the OOM killer.
>
> This patch if accepted should also be considered a -stable candidate.
Why? The changelog doesn't convey much seriousness?
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6034dc9..af2d907 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, vma, addr);
> if (!page) {
> hugetlb_put_quota(inode->i_mapping, chg);
> - return ERR_PTR(-VM_FAULT_OOM);
> + return ERR_PTR(-VM_FAULT_SIGBUS);
> }
> }
>
This affects hugetlb_cow() as well?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>