On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:39:46 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:14:42PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:01:33PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >> >
> >> > mmotm 2010-04-15-14-42
> >> >
> >> > When I tried
> >> > # echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/compaction
> >> >
> >> > I see following.
> >> >
> >> > My enviroment was
> >> > 2.6.34-rc4-mm1+ (2010-04-15-14-42) (x86-64) CPUx8
> >> > allocating tons of hugepages and reduce free memory.
> >> >
> >> > What I did was:
> >> > # echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
> >> >
> >> > Hmm, I see this kind of error at migation for the 1st time..
> >> > my.config is attached. Hmm... ?
> >> >
> >> > (I'm sorry I'll be offline soon.)
> >>
> >> That's ok, thanks you for the report. I'm afraid I made little progress
> >> as I spent most of the day on other bugs but I do have something for
> >> you.
> >>
> >> First, I reproduced the problem using your .config. However, the problem does
> >> not manifest with the .config I normally use which is derived from the distro
> >> kernel configuration (Debian Lenny). So, there is something in your .config
> >> that triggers the problem. I very strongly suspect this is an interaction
> >> between migration, compaction and page allocation debug.
> >
> > I unexpecedly had the time to dig into this. Does the following patch fix
> > your problem? It Worked For Me.
>
> Nice catch during shot time. Below is comment.
>
> >
> > ==== CUT HERE ====
> > mm,compaction: Map free pages in the address space after they get split for compaction
> >
> > split_free_page() is a helper function which takes a free page from the
> > buddy lists and splits it into order-0 pages. It is used by memory
> > compaction to build a list of destination pages. If
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set, a kernel paging request bug is triggered
> > because split_free_page() did not call the arch-allocation hooks or map
> > the page into the kernel address space.
> >
> > This patch does not update split_free_page() as it is called with
> > interrupts held. Instead it documents that callers of split_free_page()
> > are responsible for calling the arch hooks and to map the page and fixes
> > compaction.
>
> Dumb question. Why can't we call arch_alloc_page and kernel_map_pages
> as interrupt disabled? It's deadlock issue or latency issue?
> I don't found any comment about it.
> It should have added the comment around that functions. :)
>
I guess it's from the same reason as vfree(), which can't be called under
irq-disabled.
Both of them has to flush TLB of all cpus. At flushing TLB (of other cpus), cpus has
to send IPI via smp_call_function. What I know from old stories is below.
At sendinf IPI, usual sequence is following. (This may be old.)
spin_lock(&ipi_lock);
set up cpu mask for getting notification from other cpu for declearing
"I received IPI and finished my own work".
spin_unlock(&ipi_lock);
Then,
CPU0 CPU1
irq_disable (somewhere) spin_lock
send IPI and wait for notification.
spin_lock()
deadlock. Seeing decription of kernel/smp.c::smp_call_function_many(), it says
this function should not be called under irq-disabled.
(Maybe the same kind of spin-wait deadlock can happen.)
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>