On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:18:12 +0300 > > Correct. We're trying to reduce suckage from 2 cache misses per > access (3 for virt), to 1 cache miss per access. We're also freeing > up space in the cache for data. > > Saying the application already sucks isn't helping anything. but the guy who's writing the application will already optimize for this case... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>