> > + /*
> > + * If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
> > + * trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
> > + * will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
> > + */
> > + if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> > + sc->lumpy_reclaim = 1;
> > + else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> > + sc->lumpy_reclaim = 1;
> > + else
> > + sc->lumpy_reclaim = 0;
>
> How about making new function for readability instead of nesting else?
> int is_lumpy_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> ....
> }
>
> If you merge patch reduced stack usage of reclaim path, I think it's
> enough alone scan_control argument.
> It's just nitpick. :)
> If you don't mind, ignore, please.
Good opinion. I don't hope introduce the dependency of "reduced stack usage"
series. but I agree that I'll push your proposal later and separately.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>