Minchan Kim wrote:
V2
* change changelog
* Add some reviewed-by
alloc_slab_page always checks nid == -1, so alloc_page_node can't be
called with -1.
It means node's validity check in alloc_pages_node is unnecessary.
So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node.
It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried.
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index b364844..9984165 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
if (node == -1)
return alloc_pages(flags, order);
else
- return alloc_pages_node(node, flags, order);
+ return alloc_pages_exact_node(node, flags, order);
}
static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>